John Levine has reiterated and reminded "there's no such thing as a "3rd party signing policy" in DKIM or ADSP, hence we should talk about it.
I don't wish to have trouble here. I was planning of writing a I-D ADSP extension to add a new tag that will propose a lite weight third party signer allow list. Doug Otis has alway written a TPA (Third Party Authorization) extension for ADSP. Question: Is there a IETF RFC conflict with the functional specification of ADSP designed to exclude third party signing consideration with ADSP extensions that attempts to add third party signing practices? Thanks -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
