--On 27 September 2010 19:26:37 +0200 Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Now the MLM does its editing job. It knows the original message was > signed, so it makes sense to verify if the signature is still good > after any changes have been applied. In case verification fails, it > shouldn't try to distribute an adsp-breaking message, so it can either > send back a bounce or drop it. Oh, but I already know that my MLM is going to break any message with a signed body. UK law practically mandates the addition of unsubscription information in a message footer. We certainly require it locally. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
