Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I've posted a new issue of the DKIM implementation report. The most > interesting changes are the inclusion of a day of sample data from AOL and a > revision of the data summary reported by the OpenDKIM stats project using the > updated schema, which allows a few interesting new observations. >
Thanks for the report. I believe the most outstanding data point here is the extremely high original signing of mail. AOL's 1.2 out of 1.4 billion or 86% signatures were 1st party and your own statistics showed 73% were 1st party. This validates what I have always been felt is the high promise for DKIM exclusive (1st party or passive 3rd party) operations. Policy is inevitable to facilitate policy (domain expectation) fault detection. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
