The diffs at http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-to-bis-diff.htm and the differences between 4871 and the -00 version of the draft, not the Last Call revision.
Dave Crocker, can you update the diffs please? -Jim On 10/4/10 5:53 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM-base update, > draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-01: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis > The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010. > > This is the version of the specification that will be advanced to > Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post comments/issues. > Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think it's ready to > go. > > There is one outstanding discussion on the -01 version: > http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2010q4/014608.html > Please comment specifically on that, stating whether you agree with > the proposed change or prefer leaving the text as it is. Remember > that a change will NOT be made without support, so if you like the > change it's important to say so. > > Because this is moving the existing specification along the standards > track, substantive changes are explicitly out of scope unless someone > uncovers a serious error in the protocol. In scope are clarifications > and editorial issues. > > So: everyone please review draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-01, and comment > here by 22 October. Thanks. > > Barry, as chair > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
