At 10:57 06-10-10, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: >the place where the 5322 people roost (I hear that working group >shut down as part of IETF reorg) and at least say... "hey, this came >up in the context of 4871 and we believe
That working group did not shut down; it took a pause. At 11:50 06-10-10, Hector Santos wrote: >So the 5321/5322 filtering layer approach works fine (but we lose >interesting mail <g>). But I would not have done this if I was not >made aware of this problem by Alt-N who discovered this security hole. This case was reported in an implementation several years ago as part of a different issue. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
