> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:15 PM > To: DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> But like I said, I was ranting. > > > > Jeff, an identifier that's not bound to something is useless. It's > > like "Mike" just bouncing around the aether. Until it binds to > > something, it's not providing anything useful and certainly not > > something you'd want to alter the message disposition. > > It is bound to 3 header fields. To, Date and Message-ID.
If I can go around stamping your three signed header fields and your identifier on anything I please, I think the value of that stamp and identifier will quickly approach zero or even go negative. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
