Jim Fenton wrote: > It also adds more complexity to the specification and to > implementations. Besides, DK compatibility should become less of an > issue with time since it is a legacy protocol.
+1 IMO, DKIM is already a "complex" technology to properly implement and integrate into a system, especially with key management. We decided not to deal with DomainKeys. We don't add it or verify it. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
