On 15/Oct/10 20:36, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Title : DKIM And Mailing Lists >> Author(s) : M. Kucherawy >> Filename : draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt >> Pages : 29 >> Date : 2010-10-15 >> [...] > > This version takes into account the latest feedback. As there > hasn't been much since the 4871bis debates took over, it seemed > like a good point to post a revision. > > Chiefly the feedback was from Charles pointing out that the > verifier/receiver filtering action was not being represented > consistently. The rest was largely typos.
I have two issues: *scope* Apparently, there is consensus that "Discussion lists and broadcast lists are not the same thing" [WV]. Section 3.2 exemplifies newsletters and bulk marketing mail as "authoring" MLM modes. In facts, most of the advice covers mailing lists proper. Should ESP-lists be removed from the I-D entirely, e.g. by saying they are not covered right after their definition? [WV] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2010q3/014474.html *re-signing* After recent discussions, it seems inadvisable that "A DKIM-aware resending MLM is encouraged to sign the entire message". In particular, section 5.7 may suggest that fields that had not been signed by the author domain neither be signed by the MLM, unless the MLM itself introduced or modified them. Generic advice, such as the possibility of dropping unsigned fields, will probably be added to 4871bis. It may or may not be worth repeating it here. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
