> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 11:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims > > > The current DKIM spec does not answer these questions and easily permits > > protecting very little of the message. Almost certainly too little to > > ensure the protection you assert. > > One can also point a gun at ones own head. That doesn't make a gun a suicide > device of no value for anything else. The spec does permit people to do silly > things, but so what.
Doesn't this statement advocate for informative advice rather than normative requirements? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
