> -----Original Message----- > From: John R. Levine [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 5:25 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing > > Also, although I certainly do not purport to be a whiz at UI design, it's > hard to think of a more pessimal UI design than one that tries to tell > Grandma what parts of a message to believe with changing colors or fonts > in various parts of the message window. She can barely grasp the > difference between a green bar SSL page and one with no SSL. I don't want > to mess with the MUA at all, but rather use DKIM to help decide what > messages to show her and which messages to consign to the junk folder.
Why do we think such a sorting module can't/won't have the intelligence to do the RFC5322 Section 3.6 checks? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
