> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check >
<SNIP> > > There has been talk of applying DKIM to technologies like Usenet and HTTP > output. Packing DKIM with mail-specific verification requirements could > prevent such things from happening. Shall we also add a "but only when > used in the email context" clause? > Seeing as the M in DKIM stands for Mail, we don't have to put a "but only when used in the email context" clause. If a DKIM like approach is used for other protocols then we might reasonably text specific to those protocols - DKIH (Domain Keys Identified HTML as an example). Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
