On Oct 21, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > Take a tour through the eleven parts of Section 7 of RFC5451, and then > Appendices A and C. They provide all kinds of warnings about misinterpreting > the data provided, which amounts to pretty firm implementation advice, and > identifies ways you can shoot yourself in the foot. But none of those > sections are normative. (Actually there are two SHOULDs in 7.4, but in > retrospect they shouldn't really be there.) > > That's what I'm advocating here: The normative stuff defines the core > mechanics of the protocol itself, and the informative stuff explains why it's > done that way, detailed implementation advice including stuff about other > layers, and how one should (and shouldn't) interpret the output.
+1 Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
