On 1/10/2011 5:28 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> 1. Review Abuse: We held a Last Call on rfc4871bis that closed on 22
> October 2010. Many of us put considerable focus into a detailed edit of
> the document at that time, and to hear that other than surgical changes
> to the document in response to Last Call comments is an abuse of many
> peoples' time, and not just mine.
Separate from the larger concerns you raise, I should clarify the specific one
about use of feedback from the Last Call:
The new docs willuse the CORRECTED rfc4871bis text.
In other words, any changes produced from reviews will be in the split
documents.
d/
ps. FWIW, iSchedule was offered as an exemplar, not a motivator not a necessary
consumer. iSchedule really had nothing to do with the basis or timing of the
proposed split. Serendipity of input and thinking were responsible...
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
