On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: >> ................. Goodmail .............. >> . . >> V V >> Client -> Mail -> Transfer -> Service -> Receiver -> Recipient >> >> Goodmail interacted with the creator of the document and, separately, >> with the receiving mail service, as an adjunct "back office" service. >> To repeat: /It was not in the direct handling path./ >> >> DKIM supports that mode of operation quite nicely and it is a >> particularly powerful operational mode, so it is worth keeping that >> "configuration" in mind explicitly. Given how persistent this >> confusion seems to be it might even be worth more language, though I'm >> not coming up with a suggestion, offhand. > > This still seems to me to be too specialized a use case to list in the > specification, but would look to WG consensus on which way to go here.
I agree. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
