On 4/1/11 1:31 AM, Franck Martin wrote: > I had the feeling that Y! was using the local part of i= to do > differentiation in reputation. ie various streams within the same domain. > > I know the spec intent recommends, different domains for different streams, > but then.... > > Intuition would tell me, that few people are willing (or understand) to have > different domains for different streams.
+1. And as DKIM d= information already is shown to end users by some UA implementations (e.g. Gmail shows 'this message was signed by <domain>, when clicking on details) the need/advise to use different domains for different streams conflicts with the threat of phishers registering look-alike domains. /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
