> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 4:31 PM > To: Franck Martin > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Franck Martin > > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:22 PM > > To: John Levine > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value) > > > > But creating a sub-domain, means that the from needs to match too, > > Why? That's an ADSP thing, not a DKIM thing. > >
I think his goal is to have it be a 1st party signature (From and d= match) even absent an ADSP assertion. I'm not sure I agree that this is just "an ADSP thing, not a DKIM thing". We don't publish ADSP yet I have had receivers tell me that our doing this is useful to them. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
