> My suggestion: > INFORMATIVE NOTE: Although rsa-sha256 is strongly encouraged > and should, in general, be used whenever possible, some > senders might prefer to use rsa-sha1 when balancing security > strength against performance, complexity, or other needs. > Compliant verifiers might not implement rsa-sha1, and they will > treat such messages as unsigned. > > Barry
I meant to, and then forgot to, sign my message in a way that made it clear that I'm speaking, here, as a participant only. Barry, as participant _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
