Dave further tweaks: > INFORMATIVE NOTE: Although use of rsa-sha256 is strongly encouraged, > some senders might prefer to use rsa-sha1 when balancing security > strength against performance, complexity, or other needs. However, > compliant verifiers might not implement rsa-sha1; they will treat > such messages as unsigned.
WFM. Barry, as participant _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
