I will repeat that this issue was discussed at length, and working-group rough consensus was reached. None of the recent discussion brings up any new points that merit re-opening it, nor is there sufficient support for re-opening it to cause me to think that we need to reconsider the consensus.
Therefore, discussion of the multiple-header-field issue is closed; please do not bring it up again. Exception: I am aware that Charles and Doug want the issue re-opened. Anyone else who wants to see it re-opened and discussed again may post a message to this thread that says "Consensus needs to be re-evaluated." I will reconsider this if there's a demonstration of real support for me to do so. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
