> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:22 AM > To: DKIM IETF WG > Subject: [ietf-dkim] Last minute MLM addition (6.8) > > Section 6.8 proposes a binding between List-Post and the signing > domain: > [...] > > Proposed replacement (rewording + List-Id addition): > > A signing MLM can make its role apparent by properly choosing the > signing domain, the one used in the "d=" tag of the DKIM signatures > added by the MLM. Recognizing the role of a signer can be important > for inferring the semantics of any signed content. Two criteria are > as follows: > > * A signature can be identified as pertaining to an aliasing or > resending MLM if the domain-part of the List-Post field matches > the signing domain. > > * When no List-Post field is present, a signature can be identified > as pertaining to an authoring or digesting MLM if the right part > of the List-Id matches the signing domain. > > These criteria are not required, however; it is believed the > reputation of the signer will be a more critical data point rather > than these suggested bindings. Furthermore, these bindings are not > recognized by any current specification document.
Works for me, with slightly changed wording of the second bullet point, thus: "When no List-Post field is present, a signature can be identified as pertaining to an authoring or digesting MLM if the list-id-namespace (see [LIST-ID]) matches the signing domain." _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
