> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:14 PM > To: DKIM IETF WG > Subject: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #19 > > The best I can suggest is something along the lines of noting that > assessment-level heuristics can be aided by certain choices of signature d= > names. And then specifying what they might be, so that both signers and > verifiers know how to encourage success for the heuristics.
But doesn't the proposed text do that? Perhaps a merge of that text and this paragraph would do nicely. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
