Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> How will you state it? > > How about: > > 1. Introduction > > [...] > > 1.1. DKIM Architecture Documents > > Readers are advised to be familiar with the material in [RFC4686] > and [RFC5585] and [RFC5863], which respectively provide the background > for the development of DKIM, an overview of the service, and deployment > and operations guidance and advice. > > 1.2. Signing Identity > > [...]
+1 Perfect. Very good! I like it! Now if we can just be more "DKIM Output Complete" and be z-order compatible with the excellent section 1.1, I think I can die and rest in peace. :) -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
