Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Hector wrote:
>>
>> Now if we wish to be really truly DKIM complete:
>>
>> The AUID MAY be passed to Trust Assessors as well.
>>
>> The ODID MAY be used in advanced identity assessors such as
>> Checking Signing Practices [RFC4686, RFC5595, RFC5016, RFC5617].
>
> It already says:
>
> The output MAY include other signature properties or result meta-
> data, including PERMFAILed or otherwise ignored signatures, for use
> by modules that consume those results.
>
> Since the AUID counts as "other signature properties" and the
> RFC5322.From counts as "result meta-data", can we finally say
> we're done?
>
> (I didn't think so.)
Professional? :)
I can't be any more:
Being specific is terrific!
Spell it out. Its not a mystery. Its in-scope, not harmful and gives a
receiver a better reason to consider DKIM with greater usefulness
regarding security which no one should take for granted - even
marketers are finally get that point.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
