Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Version -10 says > > More formally, pseudo-code for the signature algorithm is: > body-hash = hash-alg (canon-body, l-param) > data-hash = hash-alg (h-headers, D-SIG, content-hash) > signature = sig-alg (d-domain, selector, data-hash) > > where: > > body-hash: is the output from hashing the body, using hash-alg. > > Shouldn't it say > > More formally, pseudo-code for the signature algorithm is: > body-hash = hash-alg (canon-body limited by l-param) > data-hash = hash-alg (h-headers, D-SIG with body-hash) > signature = sig-alg (d-domain, selector, data-hash) > > where: > > body-hash: is the output from hashing the body, using hash-alg. > It is set as the value of the bh= tag in D-SIG for computing > the data-hash. > ?
Sounds technically correct. +1 -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
