> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Eiloart [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:00 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations > > Right, but you can't address that by examining only the traffic from > the high traffic domains. If the spammers are spreading across domains, > then you won't see their traffic in that analysis.
But that's not what the report I ran produced. There's no doubt spammers are spreading across domains, but their choice of canonicalization doesn't seem to make a difference in that regard. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
