> It tells me signing and encryption certificates are valid and even their > root certificates are valid...
Well, something's wrong with it. I checked the signature in Alpine, Thunderbird, and Evolution, and they all agree it's fine. > > On 5/24/11 18:13 , "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Interestingly enough, outlook tells me this message has been tampered >>> with, but not sure why... >> >> Probably doesn't have the Comodo validation certificate. >> >> I took the copy of my message that came back from the mailing list, ran >> it >> through some rather violent transformations (mail to usenet and back) and >> the S/MIME signature still is OK. >> >> R's, >> John > > Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
