On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:58 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >>> Please review and comment by 11 July. > > I would have liked to strip even more of the cruft out of 4871bis, but > this is considerably better than the previous draft. Ship it.
Regardless of any remaining cruft, I'm glad to see this particular cruft removed. I think Pete made the right call. Ship it. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
