> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review > > I agree it's not exactly what is specified in the protocol, but this is an > implementation design issue. I think it's safe. If the DKIM protocol says I > can't do something like this, then I think we have a problem with the current > "describe it and let implementors deal with it" plan.
It's definitely not proscribed by DKIM. All I meant was that you're preventing a signer from deliberately accepting responsibility for a message thus modified (by doing only one "from" in "h="), knowing the risks of doing so. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
