On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:05 AM, John R. Levine wrote: > I'm not seeing much agreement on any changes to Murray's final draft, so > may I suggest that it's good enough and we should ship it? The potential > benefit of the proposed changes doesn't impress me as worth the amount of > argument they're provoking.
+1 Having the same argument again and again hasn't and won't convince anyone to change their minds. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
