On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 7/10/2011 7:51 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman >>> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:46 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Doublefrom language should be in ADSP, not core >>> >>> I think we should make it clear that singleton header fields like From (and >>> Subject and Date) can be added without breaking signatures unless one is >>> careful as a signer and/or a verifier. This is related to a core DKIM >>> design >>> principle and doesn't need ADSP (or other non-standard measures) for it to >>> be >>> something we should care about. >> >> I think the language we've proposed in response to the DISCUSS covers this >> appropriately. > > +1
+1 -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
