On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> There seems like there are many things wrong with this sort of > "helpfulness". If a given selector is dodgy, the reputation system > should figure that out for itself. Believing even a vaguely > positive-assertion from the source is almost certainly a mistake, > and likely to be gamed if you do. > > To be precise, the thinking was more "Don't ascribe any positive benefit to this message based on our reputation." You could still adjust your reputation of the signer based on the quality of what that domain is signing. It's a voluntary negative-only assertion. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
