On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Roland Turner wrote: > I mean what benefit would a receiver enjoy over not implementing it at > all?
It would be a spam filter basically. Being an anti-forgery protocol, it would have a high false negative rate compared to dedicated anti-spam techniques (since unforged spam definitely exists), but it would offer a very low false positive rate. Turning it on for all users by default would be even less controversial than turning on, say, Spamhaus ZEN. Except for the mailing-list-footers case and the traditional-forwarder case, no wanted mail is forged. And "EDSP" would not trigger on those two cases. ---- Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
