On 12/5/2017 1:44 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
That's DMARC working exactly as designed but not as commonly understood, which
makes it a DMARC issue (though a usability one of unmet expectations rather
than anything technical).
probably not.
it's an anti-abuse issue, where there is quite a bit of sloppiness and
confusion about all of the relevant technologies.
but the problem and the issue is the broad need for much better clarity
and precision than to assign a particular misunderstanding to that
particular technology. (People generally believe DKIM certifies the
source of a message and even its authorship.)
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
