On Friday, February 09, 2018 05:02:00 PM John R. Levine wrote:
> > If I may once again change the topic for a moment ...
> > 
> >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth/
> I pushed out a new version that says something about SPF macros,
> attempting to say that if you try to expand a UTF-8 local part, it doesn't
> match anything.  I figure this is consistent with what would happen if
> your local part was something like foo..bar which won't match anything
> either.
> I would appreciate if people would take a look and see if anything seems
> obviously wrong.  I'm doing some EAI whitepapery things for ICANN and it
> would be nice if, for a change, the advice they offer matches reality.

Thanks.  I think that's a reasonable resolution of the SPF macro issue that I 
raised.  Not ideal, in theory, but plenty good enough for the corner case it 

Does this need to update RFC 7208 since there are SPF related MUST 

Scott K
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to

Reply via email to