> i have no idea where the court discussions stand today.
there is a draft forces charter in front of the IESG now - I expect
it to be approved soon.
Scott
-----
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 08:48:20 2001
From: "tom worster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Margaret Wasserman'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Network Processors
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:35:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Is there any work underway in the IETF to standardize an
> interface for Network Processors? If so, pointers to the
> WG and/or any related drafts would be appreciated.
an attempt to start a wg in a related area is called forces:
http://www.sstanamera.com/~forces/
a bof was held at ietf49:
http://ietf.org/proceedings/00dec/00dec-156.htm
and a bofish discussion took place at ietf50 in the
gsmp wg. slides are at:
http://ietf.org/proceedings/01mar/ietf50-159.htm
and the meeting report is at the end of:
http://ietf.org/proceedings/01mar/ietf50-128.htm
under session ii.
i have no idea where the court discussions stand today.
c u
fsb
