Keith Moore wrote:
[..]
> to reopen an old discussion someone would then have to argue convincingly
> that there was a new angle or potential compromise not seen before,
> or that the conditions had changed rendering part of the old argument
> invalid or moot.
New Argument Translation considered harmful?
cheers,
gja
- I-D archives available anywhe... Pekka Savola
- Re: I-D archives availab... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: I-D archives availab... Scott Bradner
- Re: I-D archives availab... Vernon Schryver
- Re: I-D archives ava... Ofer Inbar
- Re: I-D archives ava... Keith Moore
- Re: I-D archives... grenville armitage
- Re: I-D archives... Jiwoong Lee
- Re: I-D archives... Peter Deutsch
- Re: I-D archives availab... Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: I-D archives availab... Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: I-D archives availab... Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking
- Re: I-D archives ava... vint cerf
- Re: I-D archives... Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
- Re: I-D archives availab... James P. Salsman
- RE: I-D archives availab... Ian King
