At 1:23 PM -0400 6/29/01, John C Klensin wrote: >Paul, while I generally agree with your description of the >problem, we _do_ have a standard in this case. RFC 2919 >specifies some list-specific special headers. Correct. That standard was issued after all of the SMTP servers in question were released. (For those of you who don't want to look in the RFC archive, that RFC was issued in March 2001.) > From episodic >examinations of messages arriving here from various lists, it >has gotten reasonably well implemented, almost certainly enough >so to promote it to Draft Standard if someone does the work in >the next few months. But, of course, that won't help in the current case, because this list doesn't use the standard. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
- too many "Out of Office AutoReply" CARDOSO Jorge Miguel
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" Gene Gaines
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" A James Lewis
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" Keith Moore
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply&q... Eric Rosen
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoRep... Keith Moore
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" Einar Stefferud
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply" Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply&q... John C Klensin
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoRep... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: too many "Out of Office AutoReply&q... Keith Moore
- RE: Re[2]: too many "Out of Office AutoReply&quo... Ashutosh Agarwal
- Re: Re[2]: too many "Out of Office AutoRepl... Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Re[2]: too many "Out of Office AutoReply&quo... Bob Braden
