At 2:45 AM +0100 7/3/01, Lloyd Wood wrote: >I do like the 'extend [..] the iCAP protocol without being obliged to >retain any level of compatibility with the current iCAP proposal.' >Fine, since iCAP's just an individual draft -- but isn't extending >without being compatible something only Microsoft is generally >regarded as being capable of doing? No, we have done it with SSL->TLS, S/MIMEv2->S/MIMEv3, PGPorig->OpenPGP, vCalendar->iCalendar, and so on. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Brian E Carpenter
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. James P. Salsman
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Dave Crocker
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Micah Beck
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Brian E Carpenter