> Ned writes:
> > There are all sorts of ways IP addresses can be
> > shared by multiple machines which you may or may
> > not choose to use.
> Not if you are running pure IP. Either you can uniquely identify each machine,
> or you can't, but you cannot have it both ways.
Nor did I say you could. The point is that how IP addresses are used varies. If
you want to use IP address to uniquely identify your systems you can. And
someone else can use a single IP address to refer to multiple systems. As
long as people are clear on what they are doing and don't assume what
they do applies to others there's no conflict.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Ned
- Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating Tower of Cybe... Jim Fleming
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating Towe... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating Towe... Erkki Kolehmainen
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating ... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creat... Randy Bush
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries C... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registr... ned . freed
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Kevin Farley
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... ned . freed
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Paul Ebersman
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Mark Durham
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name... Valdis . Kletnieks
