Dave Crocker writes: > For each machine to have a unique IP address, > yes each must have an IP address that no other > shares. Quite so. And if you use names in place of IP addresses, this means that every name must resolve to exactly one machine, worldwide--which rules out local interpretations of names. > However this does not prevent machines from > sharing IP addresses ALSO. If each machine has a unique address, shared addresses are irrelevant. If shared addresses are used in place of unique addresses, then the criterion of unique addressing is not satisfied.
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Paul Ebersman
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Mark Durham
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Randy Bush
- RE: Competing Domain-Name Reg... Tony Hain
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Competing Domain-Name Registries Creating Tower of ... Anthony Atkielski
