----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:42 AM Subject: Making the IETF meeting network more representative of the real world > I liked Tony Hain's suggestion that the future IETF terminal room/ > wireless LAN ntworks should offer NATted IPv4 and plain IPv6, to > better reflect the choices available to much of the world. But I > don't think that puts the two on an equal footing, so in addition > the network ought to undergo an IPv6 renumbering during Wednesday. > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12342.html VHS vs. BETAMAX.... http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12524.html RFC-2001-06-27-001 - Obtaining IPv8 Address Allocations The "toy" IPv4 Internet is a sewer. IPv8 is designed to be a swamp to cover the sewer. IPv16 is the "high-ground".... ...here are some links... Jim Fleming http://www.unir.com Mars 128n 128e http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
