Lloyd Wood wrote:

>Meeting the needs of the top layer is imo best understood by the
>top-layer group, which works within the framework already established
>by the bottom-layer group. That way you may well end up with something
>sucky, but at least it should be adequate to the needs of the top
>layer.
>
Not necessarily.  The top-layer people may not have expertise on how to 
use the bottom-layer protocol.  For example, HTTP performed badly until 
it was overhauled by people who knew TCP.

-- 
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |Organ transplants are best left to the       |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|professionals.                               |
\==============================================================/



Reply via email to