Hiya, You're entirely correct. I'm still happy to try again:-)
S. On 12/11/2012 10:01 AM, SM wrote: > At 00:58 11-12-2012, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> We did try but it didn't work. Happy to try again. If folks here are >> willing to do occasional draft reviews for privacy considerations >> please mail me offlist in the next week. I'll summarize back here >> after that > > I am aware that there was an effort to review drafts for privacy > considerations. I am also aware that some Area Directors are still > still trying. > > It is extremely difficult to get a review team started. Folks volunteer > to do the occasional review and switch off after a while (there are > actually valid reasons for that). The "please do something" approach > turns into somebody else doing the work. That does not work for obvious > reasons. :-) > > Here are some points which people might wish to consider to have privacy > reviewed: > > (a) It will not work unless there is a significant number of people > committed to perform the reviews. > > (b) The occasional review will not have a significant impact. > > (c) There isn't any IETF common practices to rely on. > > (d) It will take over a year to get anywhere. > > (e) Some document authors will not be happy about the reviews. > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
