On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the first year I remember there being things called "years" was > 1982, I'm thinking that a review of this might not be that useful, no? > > So, is there a quick rubric for RFCs to review that might be > particularly useful? E.g., should we focus on more recent ones?
:-) Not necessarily recent, but essential, like TCP and DNS. We started out with people choosing areas important to them and exploring them. I think that's a good way to continue. However, the random pick is great if you want to get out of your usual rut. I plan on using it some. I like discovering unexplored regions of the IETF's oeuvre. If the random pick gives you an RFC you don't think is worth reviewing, just spin again -- it's free! Scott _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
