Hi Christian,
At 23:44 21-05-2014, Christian Huitema wrote:
Oops. That's what I get for trying the lottery. The UI just provides the RFC
text, which in the case of 1108 does not present its status.

I found it worthwhile to read your review as it provides a sense of what to look out for.

As I mentioned before, the lottery should only return RFC that are on the
standard track and are not obsolete. Otherwise, we are wasting the
reviewers' efforts.

The reviewer could choose one of the RFCs (in black) in the list at http://www.rfc-editor.org/categories/rfc-proposed.html

Regards,
S. Moonesamy


_______________________________________________
ietf-privacy mailing list
ietf-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy

Reply via email to