Hi Christian, At 23:44 21-05-2014, Christian Huitema wrote:
Oops. That's what I get for trying the lottery. The UI just provides the RFC text, which in the case of 1108 does not present its status.
I found it worthwhile to read your review as it provides a sense of what to look out for.
As I mentioned before, the lottery should only return RFC that are on the standard track and are not obsolete. Otherwise, we are wasting the reviewers' efforts.
The reviewer could choose one of the RFCs (in black) in the list at http://www.rfc-editor.org/categories/rfc-proposed.html
Regards, S. Moonesamy _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list ietf-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy