Hi Ted, As far as this document is concerned, we are open to address technical concerns. It will be helpful if these concerns are specific enough and hopefully in reference to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-05.
Adding a discussion on potential misuses can be considered to address the comment from Stephen if those are not redundant with the text already in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Ted Lemon >Envoyé : jeudi 5 juin 2014 23:27 >À : Brian E Carpenter >Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; Stephen Farrell >Objet : Re: [Int-area] [ietf-privacy] NAT Reveal / Host Identifiers > >On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> >wrote: >> I have to call you on that. WG adoption is not approval. It's agreement >> to work on a topic. It is not OK to attempt a pocket veto on adoption >> because you don't like the existing content. > >WG adoption is a pretty heavy action. It states that the WG has consensus >to work on the document, and weighs heavily in the consensus evaluation >during WGLC. If there are problems with the document, part of the >adoption process should be the identification of those flaws and an >agreement to address them. So bringing up those flaws during the adoption >process is crucial to the process. > >It's also worth noting that the INTAREA working group is a special working >group, with an extremely broad charter, which is moderated by the fact that >in order for work to be done by the working group, the Internet Area ADs >have to approve the work. > >So needless to say I at least am watching keenly to see if Stephen's >objections are being addressed, and likely won't approve the adoption of >the work if they aren't. > >_______________________________________________ >Int-area mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
