Darn, messed up joke by typo, correct:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4041.txt
Section 2.2


On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> To close on a lighter note: I was yesterday just randomnly stumbling across
> RFC4101 again and found particularily section 2.2 to be strikingly current.
> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 09:16:28PM -0400, Tom Pusateri wrote:
> > FYI,
> > 
> > Given the change of position with Apple’s privacy directions, I no longer 
> > wish to continue development of the IETFers app on Apple platforms. After 
> > their strong privacy stance for many years, this feels like a betrayal to 
> > me.
> > 
> > I understand that some will think this is overblown or that maybe I want 
> > inappropriate material on my device. I can assure you that this is not the 
> > case. I detest the exploitation of minors and adults on the internet.
> > 
> > But a technology that is developed for service A will eventually be used 
> > for services B & C & D. Services B & C & D may not be made public but they 
> > will exist and Apple has shown their willingness to cross the line in 
> > public which makes me think they probably have already crossed the line in 
> > private too. But I don’t mean to drag anyone else into this part of the 
> > discussion or convince anyone about my beliefs. That is not the point of 
> > this note. Please don’t try to argue with me that what Apple is doing is ok.
> > 
> > The IETFers app will continue to work for future meetings as long as 
> > nothing in the API changes on which it depends. I have no control over that 
> > and I won’t go digging through the source code to try and figure out what 
> > busted.
> > 
> > I am aware of another timezone bug that surfaced during this last online 
> > meeting. I plan to fix this bug and make one last dot release before the 
> > next meeting.
> > 
> > I wanted to make this decision public so other plans can be made if needed. 
> > This is the real purpose of this note.
> > 
> > The next obvious question is will I be working on an Android version 
> > instead? I will answer this by saying the privacy problems on Android 
> > platforms are far worse.
> > 
> > For a stroll down memory lane, the IETFers app was first released 10 years 
> > ago in July, 2011. It was a fun project and I hope people benefited from it 
> > (and continue to do so). I’ll continue to hang out on this list and 
> > contribute where I can but just not on the Apple app.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Tools-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
> > This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> > * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: [email protected]
> > * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: [email protected]
> > * Report all other bugs or issues to: [email protected]
> > List info (including how to Unsubscribe): 
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> -- 
> ---
> [email protected]
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: [email protected]
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: [email protected]
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: [email protected]
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

-- 
---
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
ietf-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy

Reply via email to