Alexey Melnikov writes: > Chris Newman wrote: > [...] > >> This approach does not alter: >> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis-09.txt> >> which is in the RFC editor queue. > > BTW, this is RFC 4954 now.
It is? Then I repeat my prediction: SASL-IR will be RFC 5000. Arnt
