John C Klensin wrote:
But one of the implied goals for 2821bis has been making the spec easier to read and understand without a comprehensive understanding of how it is organized. So, with the understanding that this is a question and not a recommendation (since I do not have an opinion), would it be useful to insert text in the command descriptions for the commands that have only a single positive reply (EHLO/HELO, DATA, RSET, NOOP, and QUIT) that explicitly identifies the code that is expected for a normal/successful reply?
I think this would help implementors.
Or would that be just clutter that makes the document longer to no good end?
