John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Such responses could, in principle, be covered by DNS > changes or extensions and an SMTP extension in the future." > > I'd like to hear from John Leslie, who originally suggested > putting something like that in.
Quick answer: as I said before, I think this battle is long lost: we look to be beating a dead horse. (If someone wants a longer explanation, feel free to ask...) > If he is now persuaded that it should be dropped, Yes. > I'd find that convincing and perhaps others would as well. -- John Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
